<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Believe The Hype (Machine): A Treatise on Responsibility in MP3 Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.urlaubshits.co.uk/2008/11/responsibility-in-mp3-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.urlaubshits.co.uk/2008/11/responsibility-in-mp3-blogging/?utm_source=subscriber&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 01:34:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.urlaubshits.co.uk/2008/11/responsibility-in-mp3-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urlaubshits.co.uk/?p=141#comment-218</guid>
		<description>Nice work. If only the other 99% of the blogging world could adhere to similar rules. 

I look forward to seeing the results of this quality over quantity mentality. 

Cheers,
Charlie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work. If only the other 99% of the blogging world could adhere to similar rules. </p>
<p>I look forward to seeing the results of this quality over quantity mentality. </p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Charlie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: internet</title>
		<link>http://www.urlaubshits.co.uk/2008/11/responsibility-in-mp3-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urlaubshits.co.uk/?p=141#comment-140</guid>
		<description>&quot;No MP3 download shall exceed 128kb in quality, without express permission&quot;

:(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;No MP3 download shall exceed 128kb in quality, without express permission&#8221;</p>
<p>:(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friction</title>
		<link>http://www.urlaubshits.co.uk/2008/11/responsibility-in-mp3-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Friction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urlaubshits.co.uk/?p=141#comment-47</guid>
		<description>So I like to consider myself a bit of a DJ. As a bit of a DJ I want to be on the cutting edge and the ability to do this was made (too?) easy by the massive boom in mp3 blogs. It took me a couple months to find myself disillusioned with the feeling of being cutting edge, for cutting edge&#039;s sake. I have since that moment searched out only blogs which point me in the right direction without giving putting all the ammo out there for me like low hanging fruit. 

I agree with your sentiments and rules (&#039;cept 7, the new soulwax mix of the Stones is killer, advanced copy of that would have been sweetness! ;) and I&#039;ll be around here for precisely that reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I like to consider myself a bit of a DJ. As a bit of a DJ I want to be on the cutting edge and the ability to do this was made (too?) easy by the massive boom in mp3 blogs. It took me a couple months to find myself disillusioned with the feeling of being cutting edge, for cutting edge&#8217;s sake. I have since that moment searched out only blogs which point me in the right direction without giving putting all the ammo out there for me like low hanging fruit. </p>
<p>I agree with your sentiments and rules (&#8216;cept 7, the new soulwax mix of the Stones is killer, advanced copy of that would have been sweetness! ;) and I&#8217;ll be around here for precisely that reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.urlaubshits.co.uk/2008/11/responsibility-in-mp3-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urlaubshits.co.uk/?p=141#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Having come across this site via searching for Joakim Remixes on Hype Machine, I must commend you on this post as it&#039;s something that troubles me also. 

I&#039;ve been blogging for 11 months now, and I&#039;ve thought about many of the issues raised above. Having formulated my own (and very similar) code of ethics when it comes to content, it&#039;s become much more of an emotive process and I think that the blog is better off for it.

I&#039;d like to think that in a &#039;post-blog house&#039; time, most of the big hitters will be found out and found wanting. As people are becoming increasingly tired of that general sound, they&#039;ll start looking elsewhere for good music and that&#039;s when it will be the genuine music loving blogger who&#039;ll benefit.

Personally, I have no problem with drawing in readership with the odd album track/b-side/remix that really excites me in the hope that a decent percentage of the HypeM traffic will read a few other posts and discover something new, as about 75% of the posts are dedicated to new artists that haven&#039;t featured on HypeM previously.

One of the biggest problems seems to be content for content&#039;s sake and most of the big hitters seem to have lost sight of what it&#039;s all about, posting whatever lands in their inbox at the time. It&#039;s become lazy and the press agencies/labels might as well cut out the middle man and start their own blogs (if this hasn&#039;t happened already).

So much more to talk about but I&#039;ll leave it at this for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having come across this site via searching for Joakim Remixes on Hype Machine, I must commend you on this post as it&#8217;s something that troubles me also. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been blogging for 11 months now, and I&#8217;ve thought about many of the issues raised above. Having formulated my own (and very similar) code of ethics when it comes to content, it&#8217;s become much more of an emotive process and I think that the blog is better off for it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to think that in a &#8216;post-blog house&#8217; time, most of the big hitters will be found out and found wanting. As people are becoming increasingly tired of that general sound, they&#8217;ll start looking elsewhere for good music and that&#8217;s when it will be the genuine music loving blogger who&#8217;ll benefit.</p>
<p>Personally, I have no problem with drawing in readership with the odd album track/b-side/remix that really excites me in the hope that a decent percentage of the HypeM traffic will read a few other posts and discover something new, as about 75% of the posts are dedicated to new artists that haven&#8217;t featured on HypeM previously.</p>
<p>One of the biggest problems seems to be content for content&#8217;s sake and most of the big hitters seem to have lost sight of what it&#8217;s all about, posting whatever lands in their inbox at the time. It&#8217;s become lazy and the press agencies/labels might as well cut out the middle man and start their own blogs (if this hasn&#8217;t happened already).</p>
<p>So much more to talk about but I&#8217;ll leave it at this for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

